• Product
  • Suppliers
  • Manufacturers
  • Solutions
  • Free tools
  • Knowledges
  • Experts
  • Communities
Search


Arc Flash Protection | -Active Arc Elimination Technology

Garca
Field: Design & Maintenance
Congo

An arc flash is one of the most destructive industrial incidents you might encounter. In an instant, your switchgear can be destroyed, downstream equipment severely damaged, operations shut down for days or weeks, and personnel seriously injured or killed.

In certain facilities or applications, the potential risk of arc flash is very low; conventional (arc-flash unprotected) switchgear can be used with minimal risk. However, in most applications, it makes far more sense to rely on equipment incorporating features designed to mitigate arc flash hazards—providing a prudent "insurance policy" against the catastrophic consequences of an arc incident.

The destructive potential is immense. The energy released during an arc flash in 11kV switchgear is equivalent to the energy required to launch six space shuttles. Temperatures can reach up to 20,000°C—five times hotter than the surface of the sun—capable of vaporizing metal.

Arc faults may be rare, but they represent the most severe type of fault that can occur in a switchgear system. Potential causes are varied, including human error (the most common), technical/equipment failure, and environmental factors.

You can choose from several methods to reduce the risk of arc flash damage and injury. Three of the most common are described below.

Passive Internal Arc Protection

With passive internal arc protection, an arc fault is interrupted after it occurs by conventional protective relays. The average time between arc initiation and relay tripping ranges from 100 to 1,000 milliseconds (ms)—literally within the blink of an eye, which is typically measured at 100 to 400 ms.

Although this duration is extremely brief, the arc event will almost certainly cause sufficient damage to require switchgear repair or replacement of parts. Production processes dependent on the switchgear may also suffer severe disruption.

Switchgear with passive internal arc protection incorporates a type of ducting system that provides an "escape route" for high-pressure, high-temperature, and potentially toxic gases. Some switchgear includes a duct leading to an external area. This solution is typically used in smaller switchgear rooms. If the switchgear is located in a larger room or away from exterior walls, the ducting may vent into the room where the switchgear is installed.

Both ventilation strategies reduce or eliminate the ejection of arc gases from the front of the switchgear, helping to minimize potential injury. They also help dissipate explosive pressure, reducing internal damage to the switchgear.

Active Internal Arc Interruption

In switchgear equipped with active internal arc interruption, the protection circuit operates independently of the protective relay. The typical arc interruption time is approximately 60–80 ms, which is the sum of the time required to detect the arc, initiate the circuit breaker, and complete the breaker operation.

Sensing technology sends a signal to the upstream circuit breaker to interrupt the circuit, detecting the arc very quickly. Two common arc detection methods are current-sensing devices and/or optical light sensors that "see" the flash. The response time is faster than passive internal arc protection, but still insufficient to prevent potentially significant damage and injury.

It is well known that spring-operated circuit breakers can increase their tripping time as they age, resulting in longer arc extinguishing times. Longer tripping times are directly linked to increased arc flash damage. This is not an issue with magnetic circuit breakers, which do not slow down over time.

Active Arc Elimination

The two methods above help reduce the potential damage and injury caused by arcs, but it is important to note that both are reactive—they respond only after an arc has occurred. The third method, active arc elimination, is designed to respond so quickly that it can almost entirely eliminate the arc.

Technically, like the previous methods, it also reacts to an arc once it occurs, but its response is so rapid that damage to the switchgear is typically minimal, and the risk of injury to personnel is negligible or nonexistent. It achieves a significantly faster response—usually less than 1.5 ms and never exceeding 4 ms. Instead of tripping the upstream circuit breaker, it uses an Ultra-Fast Earthing Switch (UFES) to initiate a three-phase grounded short-circuit when an arc fault occurs.

The UFES, combined with fast and reliable fault detection via various sensing methods, helps ensure that an arc fault is extinguished almost immediately after it occurs. This results in a dramatic reduction in heat and pressure. Resetting the switchgear typically requires only wiping the interior and replacing primary switching elements—all of which can usually be completed within a few hours.

Summary

If a fire breaks out in your home, having a detection and alarm system that immediately alerts the fire department, bringing them within minutes, is reassuring. But even more reassuring would be a system that prevents the fire from starting in the first place. This is analogous to how active arc elimination distinguishes itself from other arc fault management methods.

Active arc elimination is arguably the most effective method for reducing arc flash hazards, though it comes at a slightly higher cost compared to other protection methods. For switchgear lacking any arc protection design, active arc elimination represents a relatively small investment relative to the value of the switchgear it protects. When evaluating cost-benefit, it is also important to consider additional costs arising from production or process interruptions following an arc event.

To help provide the highest level of protection for your personnel and switchgear, and to minimize the risk of operational disruption, active arc elimination via an ultra-fast earthing switch is the right choice for your switchgear.

Give a tip and encourage the author!
Recommended
Why Regular Transformer Maintenance Matters: 5 Serious Consequences of Neglecting It
I. Allowable TemperatureWhen a transformer is in operation, its windings and iron core generate copper loss and iron loss. These losses are converted into heat energy, causing the temperature of the transformer's iron core and windings to rise. If the temperature exceeds the allowable value for a long time, the insulation will gradually lose its mechanical elasticity and age.The temperature of each part of the transformer during operation is different: the winding temperature is the highest, fol
Rockwell
09/12/2025
How to Implement Condition-Based Maintenance for Power Transformers? A Complete 4-Step Process Analysis
1. Definition of Condition-Based MaintenanceCondition-based maintenance refers to a maintenance method where decisions on whether and how to perform maintenance are determined based on the real-time operating status and health condition of equipment. It has no fixed maintenance methods or schedules. The prerequisite for condition-based maintenance is the establishment of equipment parameters and the comprehensive analysis of various operational information of the equipment, so as to make reasona
Noah
09/12/2025
Can't choose a dry-type transformer? Get expert advice – free.
Traction Rectifier TransformersRated capacity: 800 to 4400 kVA; Voltage class: 10 kV and 35 kV; Rectifier pulse number: 12-pulse and 24-pulse. Compared with 12-pulse rectifier circuits, 24-pulse rectifier circuits can reduce the harmonic pollution of the power grid by 50%, and no filtering equipment is needed at this location. It is suitable for power supply systems of urban subways and rail transit.Excitation Rectifier TransformersRated capacity: 315 to 3000 × 3 kVA; Voltage class: 10 kV, 13.8
Vziman
09/12/2025
High harmonics? Your transformer may be overheating and aging fast.
This report is based on the analysis of one-day power quality monitoring data of your company's distribution system. The data shows that there is significant three-phase current harmonic distortion in the system (with a high total harmonic distortion of current, THDi). In accordance with international standards (IEC/IEEE), harmonic currents at this level have posed substantial risks to the safe, reliable, and economical operation of the power supply transformer, mainly manifested in additional h
Leon
09/12/2025
Related Products
Seed Inquiry
Download
Get the IEE Business Application
Use the IEE-Business app to find equipment, obtain solutions, connect with experts, and participate in industry collaboration anytime, anywhere—fully supporting the development of your power projects and business.